R.I.P.
Mainly (but not exclusively) on music and musicians
Amazing,
isn’t it, that in Victorian times, without the benefit of modern technology,
when people wrote letters by the score, it was possible to write to your wife
in the morning to say that you would be late home from work that evening and
the letter would be delivered in the afternoon.
Now,
with all the technology currently at our disposal, and (apparently) far fewer
letters now written, Royal Mail is proposing that second-class letters will in
future be delivered only every other working day – which, in some areas, will
actually be an improvement, I understand!
In Victorian London there were up to twelve deliveries a day, six days a week. Even during my childhood, two daily deliveries and, at Christmas, cards were delivered as soon as a deliverable quantity had accumulated at the Post Office – again, in far greater numbers than today.
Progress?
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/the-british-museum-drop-bp
Last
year, all signs showed that - after 27-years - BP’s dirty sponsorship of the
British Museum was finally over…
But, in a shocking move, the museum has signed a NEW
sponsorship deal with the oil and gas giant - which will run for 10 YEARS!
After decades of backing climate
delay and denial, BP is still pushing the world deeper into climate breakdown.
Earlier this year, BP said it would increase investment in the production of
fossil fuels by about $1 billion a year, above its previous plans for the rest
of the decade. This is the total opposite direction that we should be heading
in.
Crucially, BP’s business plans are
not aligned with the goal of limiting global heating to 1.5°C, the target that world
leaders have signed up to in the Paris Climate Agreement.
Communities in Argentina, West Papua,
Mexico, and Azerbaijan – to name but a few – have faced violence and
imprisonment for standing up against BP’s extraction, pollution and corruption.
And today, BP continues to work closely with human rights-abusing regimes in
order to gain access to their oil and gas reserves, and used its exhibition
sponsorship at the Museum to advance its business interests in countries such
as Egypt, Iraq and Russia.
But things can change. From the
National Portrait Gallery to the Royal Shakespeare Company, most of the
cultural sector has largely cut ties to fossil fuel funding, and a new ethical
standard for sponsorship has been set.
But once again, The British Museum has
chosen to be on the wrong side of history. It has decided to back profit-making
polluters, not the people.
Enough is enough.
It’s time to draw a red line - and
stop backing BP.
Please sign our NEW PETITION telling
Chair George Osborne that enough is enough!
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/the-british-museum-drop-bp
https://www.megaphone.org.uk/petitions/stop-suffolk-council-s-100-arts-funding-cuts
Equity members, local residents, arts
and cultural organizations across East Anglia have raised serious concerns
following a proposed £528,000 cut to arts and culture funding by Suffolk County
Council.
The nine organizations affected cover
the whole county and include: Suffolk Artlink, the Theatre Royal in Bury St
Edmunds, the Food Museum in Stowmarket and The Long Shop Museum in Leiston, New
Wolsey Theatre, DanceEast and Eastern Angles in Ipswich, Gainsborough’s House
in Sudbury and FirstLight Festival in Lowestoft.
While these cuts represent a tiny
fraction of the council's need to save £64.7 million, they will have a
disproportionate impact on Suffolk residents who rely on the arts and culture
for employment and the wider community engaged with the vital support provided
by these organizations across the county.
Companies like Eastern Angles and New
Wolsey Theatre tour schools and special educational needs settings providing
performances and workshops for children. Suffolk Artlink delivers services to
diverse communities including children at risk and vulnerable adults,
contributing to Suffolk County Council's strategic priorities. The Food Museum
in Stowmarket has a national reputation for its community work, but now faces a
13% cut to its core funding.
Together these organizations provide
hundreds of jobs, support the local economy and provide thousands of hours of
engagement for children and adults who need it in Suffolk. They do not deserve
to lose access to culture.
Sign the petition to oppose these
100% cuts now.
https://www.megaphone.org.uk/petitions/stop-suffolk-council-s-100-arts-funding-cuts
WATCH - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCV-3MUx3dI
Melvyn Bragg’s
speech in the House of Lords, launching a debate on the contribution of the
arts to our economy and society, has already been viewed over a million times.
Lord Bragg argued that the arts
are ‘the opportunity this society needs to reform itself, to replenish all
parts and pockets’. He expressed concern about local authority budget cuts and
widening inequality in arts education, saying ‘enormous rewards could
follow from building up the arts’.
Responding for the Government, Arts
and Heritage Minister Lord Parkinson said that ministers ‘agree
wholeheartedly with the sentiments Lord Bragg put forward’. He acknowledged
that the arts ‘remain an integral part of our national life’ and
are ‘an essential part of what makes life worth living’.
Lord Parkinson paid tribute to the
Campaign for the Arts for keeping ‘all of us on our toes’ at a
time when arts funding and provision are at risk in many parts of the country.
It comes just weeks after Scottish Labour’s Shadow Culture Secretary said: ‘the
Government have clearly been feeling the heat on this, thanks to the work of
the Campaign for the Arts’.
Campaign for the Arts
is demonstrating the scale and strength of public support for the arts –
and is being heard. Please share the videos above, invite
a friend to join us, and if you can, please become
a regular Donor with £3 a month or whatever you can afford.
Please sign this petition!
The Ministry
of Justice proposes to digitise and then allow the destruction of original
wills after 25 years. We call for the original wills to be preserved in
perpetuity in line with current legislation. Do not agree to legislative
changes that would allow the destruction of these documents.
More details
1. We think
costs of digital preservation and storage could be astronomical.
2. The loss of digital files may be more likely than the loss of physical
documents, for example via file corruption and cyber attacks.
3. Flaws and errors made during the digitisation process may happen. [This is
obvious for all to see in current transcriptions of certificates of births,
marriages and deaths, census records, etc.]
4. The proposed changes to legislation may set a detrimental precedent for the
destruction of other archive collections.
5. Physical documents provide additional information, such as the materiality
of the documents, [revealing notes in margins], etc.
And here:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/654081
This recent YouTube discovery
might amuse readers. I think it’s brilliant!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRhjWdr-LAA