Further comments on the arts education cuts
From The Stage, 4 May:
Actor Samuel West, who is chair of
the National Campaign for the Arts, branded the cuts "horrific" on
social media.
He
told The Stage: "The
arts are now shouting from so many barricades: Covid, education, Brexit,
funding, local government.
‘We
are spread thinly and getting hoarse. But even among the government’s recent
proposals, this one is particularly ill-thought-out and must be opposed.
‘Art
is not a hobby and talent can come from anywhere. Affordable music, drama and
design courses fund a profitable world-class industry that keeps us sane and
civilised.’
West
said the cuts would ‘narrow and eventually choke’ the talent pipeline in the
industry.
‘How
can you think that [our] industry is not “a priority”, unless through some
twisted world view that believes turning out empathetic people who work
collectively and are skilled in critical thinking is inimical to your vision?
That punitive, philistine agenda is now the only explanation I can think of,’
he added.
The
Musicians’ Union warned that the cuts would be ‘catastrophic’ for music
provision at HE level and said they would affect its members’ work, the
financial viability of music courses as well as training for the next
generation of musicians and music professionals.
According
to the MU, the notice given of the cut is ‘far too short to enable HE
institutions to plan for September’ and could result in the UK losing its ‘world-leading
status’ for music provision.
Meanwhile,
BECTU head Philippa Childs said it was ‘extremely disappointing to see the arts
devalued in this way’.
She
added: ‘The arts make a vital contribution to the economy and the social fabric
of the country, and it’s high time this was recognised by the government.’
Equity
general secretary Paul W Fleming said the union also strongly opposed the cuts.
‘This is yet another government
attack on arts education, following years of deprioritising drama and other
creative subjects in our schools,’ he told The
Stage.
‘What
is most troubling about the proposal to cut 50% of funding for these HE courses
is that it blocks a route into the creative industries for working-class and
other marginalised groups.’
National
Drama, the professional association for drama teachers, said it was ‘appalled
by and extremely critical’ of the government’s proposal.
Writing
on behalf of campaign group MusicHE, Graeme Du Fresne, who is head of music and
singing at Italia Conti, said opportunities for students from disadvantaged
backgrounds would be reduced by the funding cuts.
Du
Fresne said: ‘There’s a strong whiff of the government knowing the price of
everything and the value of nothing in their thinking, which appears to be
driven by the notion that graduate career income in performing arts subjects
fares poorly with some other professions.
‘This
analysis fails to consider a number of benefits arts performance delivers to
communities and the country as a whole. For example, during the pandemic we
have witnessed the arts’ ability to foster well- being, helping to heal and nourish
the nation in lockdown.’
Others
who have spoken in opposition of the cuts include director Gemma Bodinetz and
set and costume designer Vicki Mortimer.
Mortimer
argued that the funding cut would ‘threaten the financial viability of training
courses in creative and performing arts, and reduce the opportunities for the
next generation of creative-sector professionals’.
A
spokesman for the Office for Statistics said: ‘We are currently consulting on proposals and we will take
account of responses from universities, students, and others before making any
final decisions on our funding method.’
The
Department for Education has been contacted for comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.